WRC Upholds Constructive Dismissal and Protected Disclosure Complaints

June 4, 2026

Click Here to Read Decision: ADJ-00045744


Health and safety concerns, deteriorating workplace relationships and poor record keeping create significant exposure for employers


A recent Workplace Relations Commission decision, ADJ-00045744, serves as an important reminder for employers of the significant risks that can arise where employee concerns relating to health and safety and workplace compliance are not managed appropriately.


The case involved a number of complaints brought by an employee, against Timber Frame Projects Limited / Timber Frame Ireland. The complaints included constructive dismissal, penalisation under the Protected Disclosures Act, breaches of working time legislation and failures relating to terms and conditions documentation.


The employee worked as a carpenter/site worker and alleged that throughout his employment he regularly worked excessive hours, did not always receive appropriate rest breaks and raised concerns regarding health and safety and workplace practices on site.


According to the decision, the employee made a number of complaints and observations regarding safety concerns and compliance related matters during the course of his employment. The adjudicator accepted that these concerns constituted protected disclosures under the Protected Disclosures Act.


Importantly, the employee had not submitted a formal “whistleblowing complaint” or specifically described his concerns as protected disclosures. However, the adjudicator noted that this was not necessary for statutory protection to apply.


This is a particularly important point for employers.


In practice, many managers still associate protected disclosures with formal whistleblowing procedures or major allegations of wrongdoing. However, concerns raised informally by employees regarding health and safety, legal compliance or workplace practices may still attract protection under the legislation.


The adjudicator found that following the raising of these concerns, the relationship between the employee and the employer deteriorated significantly. Tensions developed within the workplace and the employee alleged that his treatment changed after concerns had been raised.


The decision highlights how quickly workplace relationships can become strained once concerns relating to safety or compliance issues emerge, particularly in smaller or operationally pressured workplaces where managers may feel personally challenged by complaints being raised.


One of the key findings in the case was that the employee suffered penalisation connected to the protected disclosures made.


The Protected Disclosures Act provides very significant protections for employees who raise concerns relating to relevant wrongdoing. Employers should be aware that penalisation is interpreted broadly and can include not only obvious disciplinary action or dismissal, but also changes in treatment, deterioration in workplace relationships, exclusion, hostility or other negative consequences following disclosures being made.


The case also involved several complaints under working time legislation.


The employee alleged that he regularly worked excessive hours and that appropriate records were not maintained. The adjudicator was critical of the employer’s inability to produce adequate working time records demonstrating compliance with statutory obligations.


This continues to be an area where many employers remain exposed.


Employers frequently rely on informal arrangements, verbal understandings or assumptions regarding hours worked, particularly in construction, hospitality and operational environments. However, where WRC claims arise, employers carry the burden of demonstrating compliance through proper records.


The absence of adequate records can significantly weaken an employer’s defence, even where the employer disputes the employee’s account.


The adjudicator also upheld the constructive dismissal complaint.


Constructive dismissal cases are notoriously difficult for employees to win, as employees must generally demonstrate that the employer’s conduct was sufficiently serious to justify resignation. However, in this case, the adjudicator found that the combination of the deteriorating relationship, the handling of the concerns raised and the breakdown in trust and confidence contributed to the employee’s resignation.


One of the more interesting aspects of this decision is that it demonstrates how multiple smaller issues can combine to create substantial legal exposure for employers.


There was no single dramatic incident at the centre of the case. Instead, the findings arose from a combination of concerns regarding workplace practices, deteriorating relationships, inadequate records, communication difficulties and the handling of employee complaints.


This is something employers should be particularly mindful of.


Many WRC claims do not arise solely because an employee initially raised concerns. They arise because of how the situation evolves afterwards.


Where employees begin to feel ignored, isolated, treated differently or unsupported after raising concerns, workplace relationships can deteriorate very quickly and legal risks can escalate significantly.


The decision also highlights the importance of ensuring managers are appropriately trained in handling employee complaints and protected disclosures. Managers do not always recognise when concerns raised informally by employees may attract statutory protection and poorly handled responses can unintentionally create exposure for the company.


Employers should ensure there are clear reporting structures, appropriate documentation, professional communication and careful management of workplace relationships once concerns are raised.


This case serves as a useful reminder that protected disclosures legislation has a broad scope and that even informal health and safety concerns can create significant legal obligations for employers.


It also reinforces the importance of maintaining compliant working time records, ensuring terms and conditions documentation is up to date and managing workplace concerns carefully before relationships deteriorate beyond repair.


If you would like support reviewing workplace policies, managing protected disclosures, conducting workplace investigations or training managers on handling employee concerns appropriately, MSS The HR People can help.



Contact us at info@mssthehrpeople.ie, call +353 1 887 0690 or visit www.mssthehrpeople.ie.


Amy Vickers

WRC Finds Pregnancy Discrimination Following Probationary Review
By Amanda Scully August 18, 2026
A recent WRC decision highlights the importance of fair, well documented probation procedures, particularly where pregnancy or pregnancy-related illness is involved.
Record €323,000 WRC Award Highlights the Serious Risks of Whistleblower Penalisation
By Amanda Scully August 18, 2026
WRC decision has highlighted the significant consequences for employers where an employee is found to have been penalised after making protected disclosures.
Pregnancy Loss Leave Bill – Proposed New Statutory Leave for Employees
By Amanda Scully August 18, 2026
Proposed new statutory entitlement to paid leave for employees who experience pregnancy loss before 23 weeks' gestation
Can Employees Use ChatGPT at Work? What Irish Employers Should Consider
By Amanda Scully August 18, 2026
Do employees understand how AI can be used safely and appropriately in the workplace
New Retirement Age Legislation Takes Effect on 29 June 2026
By Amy Vickers July 1, 2026
The Employment (Contractual Retirement Ages) Act 2025 introduces new obligations for employers who operate a contractual retirement age below State Pension Age .
Labour Court Issues First Decision on Right to Request Remote Working
By Amanda Scully June 30, 2026
A landmark Labour Court decision reinforces that the right to request remote working, highlighting the importance of employers following the correct process.
How SMEs Can Attract Great Candidates Without Big Salaries
By Amy Vickers June 30, 2026
Recruitment is about more than pay, and SMEs can gain a competitive edge by promoting the unique benefits of working in a smaller organisation.
Hot Weather in the Workplace: Employer's Responsibilities?
June 30, 2026
As Ireland experiences warmer weather, we examine employers' responsibilities and share practical tips for creating a safe and comfortable working environment.
By David Casey June 12, 2026
One of the biggest mistakes we see employers make is starting recruitment before defining exactly what they need.  When a vacancy arises, there is often pressure to recruit quickly. However, taking time to plan before advertising a role can significantly improve recruitment outcomes and reduce costly hiring mistakes. Before starting the recruitment process, employers should ask themselves five fundamental questions. 1. Do We Actually Need to Hire This Person? Before recruiting, consider whether a new hire is genuinely required. Is the workload permanent? Could responsibilities be redistributed? Is there another solution available? Recruitment should address a business need, not simply fill a vacant seat. 2. What Exactly Do We Need From This Person? Many employers focus on job titles rather than outcomes. Consider: • What responsibilities will they own? • What skills are essential? • What results should they achieve? A clear understanding of the role makes it easier to identify the right candidate. 3. Will This Candidate Be the Right Cultural Fit? Technical skills are important, but so is cultural fit. A candidate may have the right experience on paper, but will they align with your company values, team dynamics, and ways of working? Long-term success often depends on both capability and compatibility. 4. Are Our Expectations Realistic and Sustainable? Unrealistic expectations can make recruitment unnecessarily difficult. Employers should assess whether the salary, responsibilities, and required experience are aligned with the realities of the market. The ideal candidate rarely ticks every box. 5. Do We Have the Infrastructure to Support and Retain Them? Hiring successfully requires a meaningful investment of time. Before proceeding, evaluate whether you have the necessary time, administrative resources, and budget to effectively interview, onboard, and train a new employee. Recruitment doesn't end when the offer is accepted. Supporting and retaining talent is equally important. Key Takeaway Recruitment done right is rewarding for both employers and employees, laying the foundation for a successful and productive working relationship. However, it requires careful planning, time, and investment to achieve the best outcomes. Taking the time to answer these five questions before recruiting can help streamline your hiring process, protect your budget, and ensure you're attracting the right person for your business. If you're planning a hire and would like support with your recruitment strategy, we're happy to help. info@mssthehrpeople.ie | 01 887 0690
WRC Criticises Employer Conduct, Workplace Practices and AI Generated Submission
By Amy Vickers June 4, 2026
WRC decision highlights that seemingly casual comments, compliance failures, and the careless use of AI material can all contribute to legal liability