Labour Court Issues First Decision on Right to Request Remote Working

June 30, 2026

The Labour Court has issued its first determination concerning an employee's right to request remote working under the Work Life Balance and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 2023.


In the case of TikTok Technology Ltd v Musaev, the Labour Court upheld the employer's decision to refuse an employee's request to work remotely and provided important clarification on how disputes relating to remote working requests will be assessed by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) and Labour Court.


What Does the Right to Request Remote Working Mean?

Since March 2024, employees have had a statutory right to request a remote working arrangement.


It is important to note that the legislation does not create an automatic entitlement to work remotely. Instead, it provides employees with the right to make a formal request and places obligations on employers to properly consider that request.


When a request is submitted, employers must consider both the employee's circumstances and the operational needs of the business before making a decision. Where a request is refused, the employer must communicate the decision and the reasons for the refusal in writing.


The Labour Court's Decision

In this case, the employee challenged the employer's decision to refuse a remote working request and sought to have the Labour Court examine whether the reasons for the refusal were justified.


However, the Labour Court confirmed that its role is not to determine whether an employer made the "right" decision.


Instead, its role is limited to assessing whether the employer complied with the statutory process set out in the legislation.


The Court stated that it was not its role to assess the merits of the employer's reasons for refusing the request. Rather, it considered whether the employer had followed the required procedure, including reviewing the request and providing a written response.


Having examined the evidence, the Court found that the employer had complied with its obligations and therefore upheld the decision to refuse the request.


What Does This Mean for Employers?

This determination provides welcome clarity for employers managing remote working requests.


One of the key concerns for employers since the introduction of the legislation was whether external bodies such as the WRC or Labour Court would effectively "second guess" business decisions relating to remote working arrangements.


This decision confirms that this is not the case.


The focus of any challenge will be on whether the employer followed the correct process rather than whether the WRC or Labour Court agrees with the outcome reached.


In practice, this means employers retain discretion when deciding whether a role is suitable for remote working, provided requests are considered fairly and in accordance with the legislative requirements.


The Importance of Process

While the decision reinforces employers' ability to make business decisions regarding remote working, it also highlights the importance of following a robust process.


Employers should ensure that:


  • Requests are acknowledged and considered within the required timeframe.
  • The employee's circumstances are genuinely considered.
  • Operational and business requirements are evaluated.
  • Decisions are documented.
  • Reasons for any refusal are communicated clearly in writing.
  • Records are retained demonstrating how the request was assessed.


Where employers can demonstrate compliance with the statutory framework, they are likely to be in a strong position should a complaint arise.


Key Takeaway

The first Labour Court decision on the right to request remote working confirms an important principle for employers: the legislation creates a right to request remote working, not a right to obtain it.


The WRC and Labour Court are not tasked with deciding whether an employer's refusal was reasonable from a business perspective. Their role is to determine whether the employer complied with the statutory process when considering the request.


For employers, the message is clear: process matters. By following the correct procedure, documenting decision making, and communicating outcomes appropriately, companies can significantly reduce the risk of successful challenges relating to remote working requests.


If you would like assistance reviewing your Remote Working Policy, Flexible Working Policy, or managing a remote working request, contact MSS The HR People for expert HR and Employment Law support via email on info@mssthehrpeople.ie or by phone on 01 8870 690.


Amanda McCann

How SMEs Can Attract Great Candidates Without Big Salaries
By Amy Vickers June 30, 2026
Recruitment is about more than pay, and SMEs can gain a competitive edge by promoting the unique benefits of working in a smaller organisation.
Hot Weather in the Workplace: Employer's Responsibilities?
June 30, 2026
As Ireland experiences warmer weather, we examine employers' responsibilities and share practical tips for creating a safe and comfortable working environment.
By David Casey June 12, 2026
One of the biggest mistakes we see employers make is starting recruitment before defining exactly what they need.  When a vacancy arises, there is often pressure to recruit quickly. However, taking time to plan before advertising a role can significantly improve recruitment outcomes and reduce costly hiring mistakes. Before starting the recruitment process, employers should ask themselves five fundamental questions. 1. Do We Actually Need to Hire This Person? Before recruiting, consider whether a new hire is genuinely required. Is the workload permanent? Could responsibilities be redistributed? Is there another solution available? Recruitment should address a business need, not simply fill a vacant seat. 2. What Exactly Do We Need From This Person? Many employers focus on job titles rather than outcomes. Consider: • What responsibilities will they own? • What skills are essential? • What results should they achieve? A clear understanding of the role makes it easier to identify the right candidate. 3. Will This Candidate Be the Right Cultural Fit? Technical skills are important, but so is cultural fit. A candidate may have the right experience on paper, but will they align with your company values, team dynamics, and ways of working? Long-term success often depends on both capability and compatibility. 4. Are Our Expectations Realistic and Sustainable? Unrealistic expectations can make recruitment unnecessarily difficult. Employers should assess whether the salary, responsibilities, and required experience are aligned with the realities of the market. The ideal candidate rarely ticks every box. 5. Do We Have the Infrastructure to Support and Retain Them? Hiring successfully requires a meaningful investment of time. Before proceeding, evaluate whether you have the necessary time, administrative resources, and budget to effectively interview, onboard, and train a new employee. Recruitment doesn't end when the offer is accepted. Supporting and retaining talent is equally important. Key Takeaway Recruitment done right is rewarding for both employers and employees, laying the foundation for a successful and productive working relationship. However, it requires careful planning, time, and investment to achieve the best outcomes. Taking the time to answer these five questions before recruiting can help streamline your hiring process, protect your budget, and ensure you're attracting the right person for your business. If you're planning a hire and would like support with your recruitment strategy, we're happy to help. info@mssthehrpeople.ie | 01 887 0690
WRC Upholds Constructive Dismissal and Protected Disclosure Complaints
By Amy Vickers June 4, 2026
Health and safety concerns, deteriorating workplace relationships and poor record keeping create significant exposure for employers
WRC Criticises Employer Conduct, Workplace Practices and AI Generated Submission
By Amy Vickers June 4, 2026
WRC decision highlights that seemingly casual comments, compliance failures, and the careless use of AI material can all contribute to legal liability
Is workplace conflict increasing, or are employees less tolerant?
By Amy Vickers June 4, 2026
Are workplaces actually becoming more difficult or are employees simply becoming far less willing to tolerate behaviour that previous generations may have ignored
How Long Is Too Long? The Cost of Delayed Recruitment Decisions
By Amy Vickers June 4, 2026
Many employers would be surprised to learn how often good candidates are lost because a recruitment process takes too long.
By Tara Daly May 19, 2026
Irish employers are increasingly turning to international hiring as a solution to ongoing skills shortages. This trend is particularly evident in sectors where local talent is limited and demand continues to grow. Why employers are looking overseas Common drivers include: • Difficulty filling specialist roles locally • Business expansion and growth • Increased competition for talent International hiring can provide access to a wider talent pool and support long-term workforce planning. The challenge While the opportunity is clear, the employment permit process can be complex. Employers often underestimate: • The level of detail required in applications • The importance of aligning with eligibility criteria • The potential for delays or refusals Where the process is not managed properly, the impact can be significant. Roles remain open for longer, business plans are affected, and onboarding timelines move further out than expected. Getting it right A structured and informed approach is essential. This includes: • Understanding the appropriate permit type • Ensuring the role meets eligibility requirements • Preparing a clear and robust application Where employers take the time to position the role properly and support the application with strong documentation, the process is far more likely to run smoothly. Key takeaway for employers International hiring can be a highly effective solution, but only where the permit process is managed correctly. Approached properly, it enables businesses to secure the talent they need to grow and succeed with greater certainty and less disruption. If you would like advice or support with the employment permit process, our team would be happy to assist. info@mssthehrpeople.ie | 01 887 0690
By Tara Daly May 13, 2026
A common approach we encounter is employers submitting an employment permit application and waiting to see what happens. While understandable, this approach carries significant risk. Why this approach falls short Employment permit applications are not a simple box-ticking exercise. Each application is assessed based on: • Eligibility • Justification • Alignment with current criteria If any of these elements are unclear or insufficient, the application may be delayed or refused. The impact of getting it wrong Where an application is unsuccessful: • Timelines are extended • Recruitment plans are disrupted • Candidates may withdraw In a competitive hiring market, these delays can have a real impact on the business. A role can remain unfilled for longer than expected, existing teams can come under pressure, and a strong candidate may choose another opportunity. A better approach Employers should approach permit applications as a structured process, focusing on: • Clear alignment with eligibility criteria • Strong and accurate role definition • Comprehensive supporting rationale It is far more effective to identify and address risk areas before submission than to deal with the consequences of delay or refusal later. Key takeaway for employers Submitting an application without fully assessing the risks can lead to avoidable delays. A well-prepared application significantly improves the likelihood of a successful outcome and gives the employer greater confidence throughout the process. If you’re planning an overseas hire or facing delays, we’re happy to talk it through. info@mssthehrpeople.ie | 01 887 0690
WRC awards €15,000 after employee kept on “specific purpose” contract for 10 years
By Amy Vickers May 7, 2026
A recent WRC decision is a very important reminder to employers that long running “specific purpose” and fixed term arrangements can create significant risk