EU Directive on Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions

January 23, 2023

The Government has announced the transposition of EU Directive 2019/1152 on Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions into national legislation under the European Communities Act 1972. This will make the Directive applicable to Irish law.


The Government had until August 1st, 2022 to introduce legislation implementing the Directive. While Ireland has missed this deadline some of the provisions of the Directive are already covered by Irish Employment Legislation introduced over the last two years. These includes the new statutory sick pay, which commenced on the 1st January 2023, the new public holiday for St Brigid’s Day; new rights around redundancy for people laid off during the pandemic; the recent protection of workplace tips and gratuities, and the issuing of a mini statement of terms of employment within 5 days of commencement.


Transposing the Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions Directive into Irish law is expected to give workers:

  • more complete information on the essential aspects of the work, which is to be received early by the worker, in writing;
  • a six month limit to the length of probationary periods at the beginning of a job
  • the right to seek additional employment, with a ban on exclusivity clauses and limits on incompatibility clauses;the right to know, in a reasonable period in advance, when work will take place – i.e. for workers with very unpredictable working schedules, as in the case of on-demand work;
  • anti-abuse legislation for zero-hour contract work;
  • the right for employees to request to be transferred to a form of employment with more predictable and secure working conditions, where available, and receive a reasoned written reply is such a request is denied;
  • the right to receive mandatory training, cost-free, that is required to carry out the work for which he or she is employed.


Probationary Periods

Under Article 8 of the Directive, this limits the length of the probation period at the beginning of a job to a maximum of six-months. However, there will be scope for probationary periods to last longer than six months, where justified by the nature of the employment, such as where in the interests of the worker. It should also be possible for probationary periods to be extended correspondingly in cases where the worker has been absent from work during the probationary period, for instance because of sickness or leave, to enable the employer to assess the suitability of the worker for the task in question.


In the case of fixed-term employment relationships of less than 12 months, the length of the probationary period must be adequate and proportionate to the expected duration of the contract and the nature of the work. The “Day 5” statement has also been amended to now include information relating to the duration and conditions relating to a probationary period, if applicable.


Obligation to Provide Information

The Directive expands the information required to be given to an employee on commencing employment and introduces new provisions including the ability to request transition to another form of employment with more predictable and secure working conditions (Article 12) and, the right to receive mandatory training (Article 13).


Parallel Employment

The Directive also provides the right to take up parallel employment, subject to the maximum working time restrictions of the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997. However, exceptions will be permitted on objective grounds such as health and safety, protection of business confidentiality, the integrity of the public service and the avoidance of conflict of interests.


Anti-penalisation provisions are also included, with stronger penalties for non-compliance, restriction of zero hours contracts and the provision of more precise information on hours of work,and prohibits adverse treatment of an employee who does take up other employment.


Next Steps for Employers

 Whilst this legislation has not yet been signed off, it would be no harm for employers and HR Practitioners to consider these changes when forward planning. Where a company’s terms and conditions provide for a probation period which is in excess of six-months, or for a six-month probation period that can be extended, if such an extended period cannot be justified, these clauses will need to be updated as this practice will no longer be permitted. For more, see our Employers Guidance on Probation Periods and Contracts page here or contact us on +353 1 887 0690.


We also offer advice on DISMISSAL DURING PROBATION - An Employers Guide


Please feel free to contact us at MSS for advice and guidance when reviewing your Terms and Conditions and HR documentation.

The 2026 Minimum Wage Increase — What It Means for Small Businesses and How to Get Ready
By Tara Daly October 22, 2025
The increase to €14.15 per hour will have a noticeable effect on small and medium sized businesses.
WRC Award €22k for Dismissal Regarding Sexually Explicit Texts
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
A recent Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruling has once again reinforced one of the most important principles in employment law.
Thousands of ChatGPT Conversations Available Online
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
With over 100,000 chats searchable online exposing private info, here's why employers need clear AI policies, training, and safeguards to protect sensitive data.
Budget 2026: What It Means for Employers and SMEs
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
While there are some positive measures many SMEs will feel extra pressure from wage and pension changes taking effect in 2026.
Auto-Enrolment Update: November 2025 Payroll Deadline
By Tara Daly October 1, 2025
Ireland’s new Auto-Enrolment pension scheme, My Future Fund, is edging closer and the timeline has just shifted again. Employers now need to act sooner than expected
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
What Employers Need to Know
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
In this blog, we explore a recent WRC ruling where a school was ordered to pay €85,000 in compensation after a teacher was discriminated against during an interview. The case highlights how even seemingly harmless remarks can have serious legal consequences for employers. What Actually Happened? Employee, Emily Williams, who had been working at the school under fixed-term contract and had two years’ experience there, was on maternity leave when a permanent teaching post arose. She was neither notified nor considered, even though she was eligible. Instead, the school awarded the role to a less-experienced colleague not on leave. During a subsequent interview for a fixed-term position, the principal congratulated Williams on the birth of her baby and added: “You really should enjoy every moment at home with the baby.” Williams felt the comment was unprofessional and likely influenced the outcome against her as she had learned she was unsuccessful the very next day. Why the WRC Ruled It Was Discrimination The WRC adjudicator found that: The principal’s comment, made before scoring was complete, was inappropriate and highlighted Williams’ family status. The school could not justify why a less-experienced teacher was chosen. Their claim that it was based on prior interview scores was unsupported, with no clear process to back it up. One interviewer even adjusted a score for Williams downward without explanation, further undermining the credibility of the decision. Given these failures, the WRC concluded that Williams had established a clear case of discrimination on grounds of family status. She was awarded €85,000 in compensation, with the adjudicator stressing the importance of deterrence in cases like this. Why This Ruling Matters for Employers This case underscores three vital lessons for HR and hiring managers. First, keep personal matters out of formal interviews. Even a well-meaning comment can suggest bias or influence the panel. The interview must remain strictly professional. Second, ensure documentation and process are watertight. Reliable scoring systems, consistent policies, and clear records are essential. Without them, hiring decisions become legally and reputationally vulnerable. Finally, fairness must be more than form, it must be function. Interviews should be blind to protected statuses such as family or maternity, and all decisions must be transparent and defensible. How MSS The HR People Can Help MSS is here to help Irish businesses avoid situations like this: Designing discrimination-safe interview processes, from structuring interview panels to defining scoring metrics Training hiring panels on unconscious bias and employment equality legislation Developing clear recruitment communication policies that avoid risks around maternity or other protected characteristics Providing support and representation if a dispute arises before the WRC  Let’s ensure recruitment is fair, transparent, and free of unintended prejudice. Reach out to MSS The HR People, and we’ll help you build safe, compliant hiring practices. MSS The HR People info@mssthehrpeople.ie Ph: 01 8870690
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
WRC Finds Dismissal Unfair When Employer Fails to Engage
By Tara Daly September 2, 2025
Every business needs solid HR support, that support doesn’t have to be an all-or-nothing affair, a flexible, scalable HR service can assist in your companies growth.
Three Tips to Improve Your Recruitment Process
By Tara Daly August 12, 2025
Lets explore how Irish employers can streamline hiring processes through technology, compliant CV screening, targeted advertising, and a strong employer brand.