Dismissal During Probation

November 19, 2020

DISMISSAL DURING PROBATION 


IS DISMISSAL DURING PROBATION REALLY AT THE EMPLOYER’S DISCRETION?


Employers would be aware that it is standard in Terms and Conditions of Employment to state that whilst a person is on probation, they are not subject to the terms of the Company disciplinary procedures. This clause was inserted because, in its absence, it has been argued in the past that a person on probation was subject to the disciplinary process which, of course, could extend beyond the probationary period. Thus, making termination of employment on grounds of suitability difficult within the twelve-month period thus falling under the Unfair Dismissals Acts.


However, it has become clearly established that any person is entitled to fair treatment when their employment is being terminated. In the recent decision of the Labour Court, LCR 22257, it stated “This Court has been clear and consistent in its view that workers on probation are entitled to the same fair processes that are applicable to workers with more than 12 months service with their employer, prior to any decision being taken to dismiss.


The Court is not satisfied that the worker in this case was afforded a fair process.” The Court awarded compensation of €5,000 to the employee concerned.

The Labour Court also awarded compensation of €18,000 in a case where an employee, who had successfully completed their probationary period, but had not completed 1 years’ service was terminated and again fair procedure had not been followed. (LCR22255)


This should be a salient reminder to all employers that they cannot terminate employment without any risk where the employee has less than one years’ service or is on Probation.


Any employer who is considering terminating a person’s employment should not make these decisions lightly. We recommend employers consider the process they follow and ensure they have treated the employee fairly. Such treatment includes making the person aware of any difficulties with their performance during their probationary period and that they could be dismissed if there was no improvement.


Only after having such discussions and there is no improvement, consider termination of employment. We would also recommend employers to make notations of any discussions regarding performance during a probationary period and not rely simply on verbal discussions which may have taken place during the course of a working day.


Finally, it should be noted that an employee should be advised, in advance of any such meeting that their employment may be terminated and that they may be accompanied by a work colleague or representative if they so wish.


Failure to do this will leave you exposed to claims and awards of compensation, and any decision appearing on the WRC and Labour Court website.


Should you require any further information or support please feel free to contact MSS, The HR People, and we will provide you with appropriate guidance on this or any additional matter in relation to Employment Law (01)8870690.


FURTHER DETAILS ON THE UPDATE OR ABOUT OUR SERVICES MAY BE OBTAINED

FROM: JOHN BARRY/TARA DALY/ HUGH HEGARTY AT TEL: 01 8870690


New Button
The 2026 Minimum Wage Increase — What It Means for Small Businesses and How to Get Ready
By Tara Daly October 22, 2025
The increase to €14.15 per hour will have a noticeable effect on small and medium sized businesses.
WRC Award €22k for Dismissal Regarding Sexually Explicit Texts
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
A recent Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruling has once again reinforced one of the most important principles in employment law.
Thousands of ChatGPT Conversations Available Online
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
With over 100,000 chats searchable online exposing private info, here's why employers need clear AI policies, training, and safeguards to protect sensitive data.
Budget 2026: What It Means for Employers and SMEs
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
While there are some positive measures many SMEs will feel extra pressure from wage and pension changes taking effect in 2026.
Auto-Enrolment Update: November 2025 Payroll Deadline
By Tara Daly October 1, 2025
Ireland’s new Auto-Enrolment pension scheme, My Future Fund, is edging closer and the timeline has just shifted again. Employers now need to act sooner than expected
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
What Employers Need to Know
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
In this blog, we explore a recent WRC ruling where a school was ordered to pay €85,000 in compensation after a teacher was discriminated against during an interview. The case highlights how even seemingly harmless remarks can have serious legal consequences for employers. What Actually Happened? Employee, Emily Williams, who had been working at the school under fixed-term contract and had two years’ experience there, was on maternity leave when a permanent teaching post arose. She was neither notified nor considered, even though she was eligible. Instead, the school awarded the role to a less-experienced colleague not on leave. During a subsequent interview for a fixed-term position, the principal congratulated Williams on the birth of her baby and added: “You really should enjoy every moment at home with the baby.” Williams felt the comment was unprofessional and likely influenced the outcome against her as she had learned she was unsuccessful the very next day. Why the WRC Ruled It Was Discrimination The WRC adjudicator found that: The principal’s comment, made before scoring was complete, was inappropriate and highlighted Williams’ family status. The school could not justify why a less-experienced teacher was chosen. Their claim that it was based on prior interview scores was unsupported, with no clear process to back it up. One interviewer even adjusted a score for Williams downward without explanation, further undermining the credibility of the decision. Given these failures, the WRC concluded that Williams had established a clear case of discrimination on grounds of family status. She was awarded €85,000 in compensation, with the adjudicator stressing the importance of deterrence in cases like this. Why This Ruling Matters for Employers This case underscores three vital lessons for HR and hiring managers. First, keep personal matters out of formal interviews. Even a well-meaning comment can suggest bias or influence the panel. The interview must remain strictly professional. Second, ensure documentation and process are watertight. Reliable scoring systems, consistent policies, and clear records are essential. Without them, hiring decisions become legally and reputationally vulnerable. Finally, fairness must be more than form, it must be function. Interviews should be blind to protected statuses such as family or maternity, and all decisions must be transparent and defensible. How MSS The HR People Can Help MSS is here to help Irish businesses avoid situations like this: Designing discrimination-safe interview processes, from structuring interview panels to defining scoring metrics Training hiring panels on unconscious bias and employment equality legislation Developing clear recruitment communication policies that avoid risks around maternity or other protected characteristics Providing support and representation if a dispute arises before the WRC  Let’s ensure recruitment is fair, transparent, and free of unintended prejudice. Reach out to MSS The HR People, and we’ll help you build safe, compliant hiring practices. MSS The HR People info@mssthehrpeople.ie Ph: 01 8870690
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
WRC Finds Dismissal Unfair When Employer Fails to Engage
By Tara Daly September 2, 2025
Every business needs solid HR support, that support doesn’t have to be an all-or-nothing affair, a flexible, scalable HR service can assist in your companies growth.
Three Tips to Improve Your Recruitment Process
By Tara Daly August 12, 2025
Lets explore how Irish employers can streamline hiring processes through technology, compliant CV screening, targeted advertising, and a strong employer brand.