Workplace Relations Commission Rules on Remote Work Complaint

October 31, 2024

The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) has dismissed a complaint by Rafael Jorge against his former employer, Centric Mental Health. The tribunal deemed it "reasonable" for the company to require Mr. Jorge, who was on a fully remote contract, to visit the Dublin office once a month, especially after Centric had previously adjusted the requirement from two days a week.

 

This decision marks the second ruling under the Work Life Balance and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 2023. Mr. Jorge, an accounts worker who represented himself during the proceedings, explained that he had declined another job offer to remain with Centric, having accepted a fully remote position starting in September 2022.

 

On January 11, 2024, following discussions with HR, Mr. Jorge received a letter indicating he was now "required to attend" the office at least twice a week. Mr. Jorge argued that due to his residence in Tralee, Co. Kerry, this was impractical. Despite expressing his concerns, he received insistence from his employer about the new requirements, prompting him to file a formal grievance.

 

In response to Mr. Jorge's objections, Centric reduced the attendance requirement to just one day a month. Mr. Jorge then requested additional compensation, including a pay rise, lunch allowance, and travel expenses, which the company agreed to regarding lunch and travel.

 

Centric justified its request for Mr. Jorge to return to the office, citing the need for improved communication among colleagues and the changing dynamics of the business. With other employees required to come in twice a week, the company argued that the one-day-a-month requirement for Mr. Jorge was "fair and reasonable."

 

At the June hearing, Mr. Jorge maintained that Centric was obligated to uphold the terms of his August 2022 contract amendment. However, adjudicator Brian Dalton noted that the dispute arose before the new legislation took effect. He clarified that he would assess Mr. Jorge's ongoing objections to attending the office as a request for remote work.

 

The adjudicator found that Centric had met its legal obligations and adequately assessed the business's needs against those of the employee. Ultimately, he ruled that the one-day-a-month requirement was a reasonable modification to Mr. Jorge's contract and dismissed the complaint.

 

This ruling serves as an important reminder for HR professionals to consider both employee needs and business requirements when navigating remote work arrangements.


The 2026 Minimum Wage Increase — What It Means for Small Businesses and How to Get Ready
By Tara Daly October 22, 2025
The increase to €14.15 per hour will have a noticeable effect on small and medium sized businesses.
WRC Award €22k for Dismissal Regarding Sexually Explicit Texts
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
A recent Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruling has once again reinforced one of the most important principles in employment law.
Thousands of ChatGPT Conversations Available Online
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
With over 100,000 chats searchable online exposing private info, here's why employers need clear AI policies, training, and safeguards to protect sensitive data.
Budget 2026: What It Means for Employers and SMEs
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
While there are some positive measures many SMEs will feel extra pressure from wage and pension changes taking effect in 2026.
Auto-Enrolment Update: November 2025 Payroll Deadline
By Tara Daly October 1, 2025
Ireland’s new Auto-Enrolment pension scheme, My Future Fund, is edging closer and the timeline has just shifted again. Employers now need to act sooner than expected
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
What Employers Need to Know
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
In this blog, we explore a recent WRC ruling where a school was ordered to pay €85,000 in compensation after a teacher was discriminated against during an interview. The case highlights how even seemingly harmless remarks can have serious legal consequences for employers. What Actually Happened? Employee, Emily Williams, who had been working at the school under fixed-term contract and had two years’ experience there, was on maternity leave when a permanent teaching post arose. She was neither notified nor considered, even though she was eligible. Instead, the school awarded the role to a less-experienced colleague not on leave. During a subsequent interview for a fixed-term position, the principal congratulated Williams on the birth of her baby and added: “You really should enjoy every moment at home with the baby.” Williams felt the comment was unprofessional and likely influenced the outcome against her as she had learned she was unsuccessful the very next day. Why the WRC Ruled It Was Discrimination The WRC adjudicator found that: The principal’s comment, made before scoring was complete, was inappropriate and highlighted Williams’ family status. The school could not justify why a less-experienced teacher was chosen. Their claim that it was based on prior interview scores was unsupported, with no clear process to back it up. One interviewer even adjusted a score for Williams downward without explanation, further undermining the credibility of the decision. Given these failures, the WRC concluded that Williams had established a clear case of discrimination on grounds of family status. She was awarded €85,000 in compensation, with the adjudicator stressing the importance of deterrence in cases like this. Why This Ruling Matters for Employers This case underscores three vital lessons for HR and hiring managers. First, keep personal matters out of formal interviews. Even a well-meaning comment can suggest bias or influence the panel. The interview must remain strictly professional. Second, ensure documentation and process are watertight. Reliable scoring systems, consistent policies, and clear records are essential. Without them, hiring decisions become legally and reputationally vulnerable. Finally, fairness must be more than form, it must be function. Interviews should be blind to protected statuses such as family or maternity, and all decisions must be transparent and defensible. How MSS The HR People Can Help MSS is here to help Irish businesses avoid situations like this: Designing discrimination-safe interview processes, from structuring interview panels to defining scoring metrics Training hiring panels on unconscious bias and employment equality legislation Developing clear recruitment communication policies that avoid risks around maternity or other protected characteristics Providing support and representation if a dispute arises before the WRC  Let’s ensure recruitment is fair, transparent, and free of unintended prejudice. Reach out to MSS The HR People, and we’ll help you build safe, compliant hiring practices. MSS The HR People info@mssthehrpeople.ie Ph: 01 8870690
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
WRC Finds Dismissal Unfair When Employer Fails to Engage
By Tara Daly September 2, 2025
Every business needs solid HR support, that support doesn’t have to be an all-or-nothing affair, a flexible, scalable HR service can assist in your companies growth.
Three Tips to Improve Your Recruitment Process
By Tara Daly August 12, 2025
Lets explore how Irish employers can streamline hiring processes through technology, compliant CV screening, targeted advertising, and a strong employer brand.