Retirement Age deemed discriminatory!

October 4, 2017

In a recent case, a book-keeper was awarded €12,000 from her former employer, a small retail company, for age discrimination, having forced her to retire at 66, despite there being no issues with her competence. Having worked for the Company for 12 years, the employee was forced by the company to retire at 66.


The Employee expressed a desire to remain in employment with the company and in response to this she was offered a fixed-term contract immediately following her retirement, an offer which she refused.


There was never a contract of employment/statement of terms issued to or signed by the employee, therefore it could not be argued that she had consented to the mandatory retirement age. Apparently the Company had previously tried to introduce them but the employer failed to do so when met with resistance from the employees.


The company’s contention was that the retirement age was necessary for the management of its business and also argued that there was an implied term and an oral contract with the employee that she would retire at 65 and that the setup of the Pension scheme in 2004 “clearly foresaw” a retirement age at 65.


On hearing the case, the Adjudication officer was satisfied that the claimant had established a Prima Facie case of Age Discrimination and the employer had failed to provide any objective justification for enforcing a retirement age.


The Adjudicator found that the employer’s explanation for justifying a retirement age was a “somewhat vague, anachronistic and unlawful view that it had the right to terminate employment at sixty five because it was traditional to do so. It (the company) seems have held this view honestly, in that it held the complainant in high regard as an employee and there was no element of any reflection on her conduct or competence.”


This case serves as an important reminder that employer’s must be able to demonstrate that they can objectively justify that the use of a retirement age achieves a legitimate aim for the Company or they face the threat of being found guilty of Age Discrimination. It also highlights that whilst having a retirement age in a contract or a Pension scheme does not automatically serve as a defence for Employers. 


For further details on the Retirement Age or on other HR services please email hr@mssirl.ie.

The 2026 Minimum Wage Increase — What It Means for Small Businesses and How to Get Ready
By Tara Daly October 22, 2025
The increase to €14.15 per hour will have a noticeable effect on small and medium sized businesses.
WRC Award €22k for Dismissal Regarding Sexually Explicit Texts
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
A recent Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruling has once again reinforced one of the most important principles in employment law.
Thousands of ChatGPT Conversations Available Online
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
With over 100,000 chats searchable online exposing private info, here's why employers need clear AI policies, training, and safeguards to protect sensitive data.
Budget 2026: What It Means for Employers and SMEs
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
While there are some positive measures many SMEs will feel extra pressure from wage and pension changes taking effect in 2026.
Auto-Enrolment Update: November 2025 Payroll Deadline
By Tara Daly October 1, 2025
Ireland’s new Auto-Enrolment pension scheme, My Future Fund, is edging closer and the timeline has just shifted again. Employers now need to act sooner than expected
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
What Employers Need to Know
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
In this blog, we explore a recent WRC ruling where a school was ordered to pay €85,000 in compensation after a teacher was discriminated against during an interview. The case highlights how even seemingly harmless remarks can have serious legal consequences for employers. What Actually Happened? Employee, Emily Williams, who had been working at the school under fixed-term contract and had two years’ experience there, was on maternity leave when a permanent teaching post arose. She was neither notified nor considered, even though she was eligible. Instead, the school awarded the role to a less-experienced colleague not on leave. During a subsequent interview for a fixed-term position, the principal congratulated Williams on the birth of her baby and added: “You really should enjoy every moment at home with the baby.” Williams felt the comment was unprofessional and likely influenced the outcome against her as she had learned she was unsuccessful the very next day. Why the WRC Ruled It Was Discrimination The WRC adjudicator found that: The principal’s comment, made before scoring was complete, was inappropriate and highlighted Williams’ family status. The school could not justify why a less-experienced teacher was chosen. Their claim that it was based on prior interview scores was unsupported, with no clear process to back it up. One interviewer even adjusted a score for Williams downward without explanation, further undermining the credibility of the decision. Given these failures, the WRC concluded that Williams had established a clear case of discrimination on grounds of family status. She was awarded €85,000 in compensation, with the adjudicator stressing the importance of deterrence in cases like this. Why This Ruling Matters for Employers This case underscores three vital lessons for HR and hiring managers. First, keep personal matters out of formal interviews. Even a well-meaning comment can suggest bias or influence the panel. The interview must remain strictly professional. Second, ensure documentation and process are watertight. Reliable scoring systems, consistent policies, and clear records are essential. Without them, hiring decisions become legally and reputationally vulnerable. Finally, fairness must be more than form, it must be function. Interviews should be blind to protected statuses such as family or maternity, and all decisions must be transparent and defensible. How MSS The HR People Can Help MSS is here to help Irish businesses avoid situations like this: Designing discrimination-safe interview processes, from structuring interview panels to defining scoring metrics Training hiring panels on unconscious bias and employment equality legislation Developing clear recruitment communication policies that avoid risks around maternity or other protected characteristics Providing support and representation if a dispute arises before the WRC  Let’s ensure recruitment is fair, transparent, and free of unintended prejudice. Reach out to MSS The HR People, and we’ll help you build safe, compliant hiring practices. MSS The HR People info@mssthehrpeople.ie Ph: 01 8870690
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
WRC Finds Dismissal Unfair When Employer Fails to Engage
By Tara Daly September 2, 2025
Every business needs solid HR support, that support doesn’t have to be an all-or-nothing affair, a flexible, scalable HR service can assist in your companies growth.
Three Tips to Improve Your Recruitment Process
By Tara Daly August 12, 2025
Lets explore how Irish employers can streamline hiring processes through technology, compliant CV screening, targeted advertising, and a strong employer brand.