Navigating Disciplinary Procedures - Avoiding Common Pitfalls

October 31, 2023

Navigating Disciplinary Procedures - Avoiding Common Pitfalls


Disciplinary hearings and investigations form an essential part of any workplace, acting as a corrective tool for addressing employee misconduct and performance issues whilst maintaining a just and equitable work environment.

 

Nevertheless, employers sometimes stumble into common errors during these processes, potentially resulting in legal repercussions such as claims of unfair dismissal.

 

To sidestep these pitfalls, employers must grasp and uphold fair procedures throughout disciplinary proceedings. Here are some of the typical missteps employers should steer clear of:

 

Ignoring the Disciplinary Policy

A common mistake for employers is that they forget to check their policies before embarking on a disciplinary process.  Employers must first review and adhere to their disciplinary policies. These policies should be regularly reviewed to reflect best practices, should outline the framework for handling disciplinary matters, and should be in accordance with the Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievances. Ignoring your policy can lead to accusations of unfair treatment.

 

Failing to Properly Train Managers

Some employers expect Managers or Supervisors to conduct Investigations or Disciplinary processes without any training, as they wrongly assume, often to their cost,  it is a straightforward process whereby you simply hand an employee a warning letter.  Failure to train your managers in how to properly conduct these processes can result in them inadvertently mishandling proceedings, leading to unfair outcomes and consequential awards against your business.

 

Unjustified Suspension

It is often wrongly believed that employers reserve the right to suspend an employee once they are investigating a matter. However, employee suspension should only be employed where there is a genuine risk to the business or process if the employee remains at work during the investigation. Suspension should be a measure of last resort. Employers should seek lesser options before suspending an employee; suspension should be used sparingly and in accordance with your internal policies and should always be on full pay and for as short as possible.

 

Absence of Impartiality

Some employers assume the same manager who conducts the investigation can also issue a disciplinary sanction. However, the person conducting the disciplinary hearing should be independent and impartial. Impartial in this context means someone previously unconnected with the issues involved, the previous stages of the process (i.e., not involved in the investigation) and it does not necessarily require a third party.  One individual cannot act as both the Judge and Jury where it can be avoided.

 

Neglecting to Inform About the Right to Accompaniment

Employees should be informed of their right to be accompanied by a work colleague or union representative during the disciplinary process. Legal representation is generally not required but advice should be sought where such a request is made by an employee.

 

Avoiding Disproportionate Sanctions

The outcome of a disciplinary process, especially dismissal for misconduct, should be carefully considered and ensure the sanction can be justified as a reasonable sanction, based on the circumstances.

 

Acknowledging the Right to Appeal

Employees should always be advised of their right to appeal the outcome of a disciplinary process, providing them with a chance to challenge any perceived injustices.

 

Ensuring an Impartial Appeals Process

The appeal process should be conducted by someone who was not previously involved in the disciplinary process to ensure impartiality.

 

In conclusion, every employer should have a robust disciplinary policy in place and must follow it diligently. Failure to do so can lead to a higher risk of successful unfair dismissal claims, which can be costly and damaging to your organisation's reputation.

 

By adhering to fair procedures, making, and keeping good notes/records, and avoiding common mistakes, employers can ensure that disciplinary hearings and investigations are conducted fairly and legally, contributing to a more harmonious and productive workplace.

 

As always, for advice and guidance on navigating your way through disciplinary processes, don’t hesitate to get in touch with the team MSSTheHRPeople.


By Hugh Hegarty


Contact Us
The 2026 Minimum Wage Increase — What It Means for Small Businesses and How to Get Ready
By Tara Daly October 22, 2025
The increase to €14.15 per hour will have a noticeable effect on small and medium sized businesses.
WRC Award €22k for Dismissal Regarding Sexually Explicit Texts
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
A recent Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruling has once again reinforced one of the most important principles in employment law.
Thousands of ChatGPT Conversations Available Online
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
With over 100,000 chats searchable online exposing private info, here's why employers need clear AI policies, training, and safeguards to protect sensitive data.
Budget 2026: What It Means for Employers and SMEs
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
While there are some positive measures many SMEs will feel extra pressure from wage and pension changes taking effect in 2026.
Auto-Enrolment Update: November 2025 Payroll Deadline
By Tara Daly October 1, 2025
Ireland’s new Auto-Enrolment pension scheme, My Future Fund, is edging closer and the timeline has just shifted again. Employers now need to act sooner than expected
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
What Employers Need to Know
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
In this blog, we explore a recent WRC ruling where a school was ordered to pay €85,000 in compensation after a teacher was discriminated against during an interview. The case highlights how even seemingly harmless remarks can have serious legal consequences for employers. What Actually Happened? Employee, Emily Williams, who had been working at the school under fixed-term contract and had two years’ experience there, was on maternity leave when a permanent teaching post arose. She was neither notified nor considered, even though she was eligible. Instead, the school awarded the role to a less-experienced colleague not on leave. During a subsequent interview for a fixed-term position, the principal congratulated Williams on the birth of her baby and added: “You really should enjoy every moment at home with the baby.” Williams felt the comment was unprofessional and likely influenced the outcome against her as she had learned she was unsuccessful the very next day. Why the WRC Ruled It Was Discrimination The WRC adjudicator found that: The principal’s comment, made before scoring was complete, was inappropriate and highlighted Williams’ family status. The school could not justify why a less-experienced teacher was chosen. Their claim that it was based on prior interview scores was unsupported, with no clear process to back it up. One interviewer even adjusted a score for Williams downward without explanation, further undermining the credibility of the decision. Given these failures, the WRC concluded that Williams had established a clear case of discrimination on grounds of family status. She was awarded €85,000 in compensation, with the adjudicator stressing the importance of deterrence in cases like this. Why This Ruling Matters for Employers This case underscores three vital lessons for HR and hiring managers. First, keep personal matters out of formal interviews. Even a well-meaning comment can suggest bias or influence the panel. The interview must remain strictly professional. Second, ensure documentation and process are watertight. Reliable scoring systems, consistent policies, and clear records are essential. Without them, hiring decisions become legally and reputationally vulnerable. Finally, fairness must be more than form, it must be function. Interviews should be blind to protected statuses such as family or maternity, and all decisions must be transparent and defensible. How MSS The HR People Can Help MSS is here to help Irish businesses avoid situations like this: Designing discrimination-safe interview processes, from structuring interview panels to defining scoring metrics Training hiring panels on unconscious bias and employment equality legislation Developing clear recruitment communication policies that avoid risks around maternity or other protected characteristics Providing support and representation if a dispute arises before the WRC  Let’s ensure recruitment is fair, transparent, and free of unintended prejudice. Reach out to MSS The HR People, and we’ll help you build safe, compliant hiring practices. MSS The HR People info@mssthehrpeople.ie Ph: 01 8870690
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
WRC Finds Dismissal Unfair When Employer Fails to Engage
By Tara Daly September 2, 2025
Every business needs solid HR support, that support doesn’t have to be an all-or-nothing affair, a flexible, scalable HR service can assist in your companies growth.
Three Tips to Improve Your Recruitment Process
By Tara Daly August 12, 2025
Lets explore how Irish employers can streamline hiring processes through technology, compliant CV screening, targeted advertising, and a strong employer brand.