An Initial Judgement Regarding Ireland's Sick Pay

October 31, 2023

Employers have faced uncertainty as to what they could do due to the lack of clarity in the Sick Leave Act 2022, especially regarding the legal stance when an employer operates their own sick pay scheme.


The Sick Leave Act includes a thirteen-week service as a prerequisite, before providing payment from the initial day of absence. Currently, it allows for three days of sick pay within a twelve-month timeframe. The daily pay rate is set at 70% of the average daily wages earned in the thirteen weeks preceding the illness-related absence.


In the case of Karolina Leszczynska v Musgrave Operating Partners Ireland (ADJ-00044889), the employee had been with the company since 2007 and was absent for four days in January 2023. However, the company only paid for one day of this absence, which was in accordance with their own sick pay scheme. The company argued that their scheme was more favourable than statutory sick pay. Their scheme included a six-month service requirement, three days of a waiting period (unpaid), and eight weeks of full pay in a rolling 12-month period.


The Sick Leave Act allows for provisions in the employment contract that are as or more favourable than statutory sick pay to apply instead. The Act stipulates that entitlement to statutory sick leave should replace any other provision, not add to it. Additionally, the Act does not apply if a company's sick pay scheme offers benefits that are “as a whole” better than statutory sick leave.


To determine if a company's sick pay scheme is indeed more favourable, several factors are considered, including; the service requirement, waiting period, duration of paid sick leave, the amount of sick pay, and the reference period of the scheme.


In this case, the Company did not pay for the first three days of sickness absence, and there was a six-month waiting period, as opposed to the 13 weeks required under the Ac. The good news for employers was that the Adjudicator determined that the benefits conferred under the company sick pay scheme, were “as a whole” more favourable than the Statutory Sick Pay.


Furthermore, it was recognised that the primary purpose of the legislation was to provide a benefit to employees who did not have a contractual entitlement to sick leave.


This decision has provided some much-awaited clarity for companies that offer their own sick pay scheme.

We would remind employers that statutory sick pay is due to increase, on the 1st of January 2024, to five days, and so this may mean reassessing whether their scheme continues to be as favourable or more favourable than Statutory Sick Pay in light of these additional entitlements.


Employers should consider whether they need to make any adjustments, amend any sick pay policies, and take steps to plan for the five-day entitlement in January 2024.


For further guidance and information in relation to sick pay, as always, our team here MSSTheHRPeople are here to help!


By Tara Daly


New Button
The 2026 Minimum Wage Increase — What It Means for Small Businesses and How to Get Ready
By Tara Daly October 22, 2025
The increase to €14.15 per hour will have a noticeable effect on small and medium sized businesses.
WRC Award €22k for Dismissal Regarding Sexually Explicit Texts
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
A recent Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruling has once again reinforced one of the most important principles in employment law.
Thousands of ChatGPT Conversations Available Online
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
With over 100,000 chats searchable online exposing private info, here's why employers need clear AI policies, training, and safeguards to protect sensitive data.
Budget 2026: What It Means for Employers and SMEs
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
While there are some positive measures many SMEs will feel extra pressure from wage and pension changes taking effect in 2026.
Auto-Enrolment Update: November 2025 Payroll Deadline
By Tara Daly October 1, 2025
Ireland’s new Auto-Enrolment pension scheme, My Future Fund, is edging closer and the timeline has just shifted again. Employers now need to act sooner than expected
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
What Employers Need to Know
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
In this blog, we explore a recent WRC ruling where a school was ordered to pay €85,000 in compensation after a teacher was discriminated against during an interview. The case highlights how even seemingly harmless remarks can have serious legal consequences for employers. What Actually Happened? Employee, Emily Williams, who had been working at the school under fixed-term contract and had two years’ experience there, was on maternity leave when a permanent teaching post arose. She was neither notified nor considered, even though she was eligible. Instead, the school awarded the role to a less-experienced colleague not on leave. During a subsequent interview for a fixed-term position, the principal congratulated Williams on the birth of her baby and added: “You really should enjoy every moment at home with the baby.” Williams felt the comment was unprofessional and likely influenced the outcome against her as she had learned she was unsuccessful the very next day. Why the WRC Ruled It Was Discrimination The WRC adjudicator found that: The principal’s comment, made before scoring was complete, was inappropriate and highlighted Williams’ family status. The school could not justify why a less-experienced teacher was chosen. Their claim that it was based on prior interview scores was unsupported, with no clear process to back it up. One interviewer even adjusted a score for Williams downward without explanation, further undermining the credibility of the decision. Given these failures, the WRC concluded that Williams had established a clear case of discrimination on grounds of family status. She was awarded €85,000 in compensation, with the adjudicator stressing the importance of deterrence in cases like this. Why This Ruling Matters for Employers This case underscores three vital lessons for HR and hiring managers. First, keep personal matters out of formal interviews. Even a well-meaning comment can suggest bias or influence the panel. The interview must remain strictly professional. Second, ensure documentation and process are watertight. Reliable scoring systems, consistent policies, and clear records are essential. Without them, hiring decisions become legally and reputationally vulnerable. Finally, fairness must be more than form, it must be function. Interviews should be blind to protected statuses such as family or maternity, and all decisions must be transparent and defensible. How MSS The HR People Can Help MSS is here to help Irish businesses avoid situations like this: Designing discrimination-safe interview processes, from structuring interview panels to defining scoring metrics Training hiring panels on unconscious bias and employment equality legislation Developing clear recruitment communication policies that avoid risks around maternity or other protected characteristics Providing support and representation if a dispute arises before the WRC  Let’s ensure recruitment is fair, transparent, and free of unintended prejudice. Reach out to MSS The HR People, and we’ll help you build safe, compliant hiring practices. MSS The HR People info@mssthehrpeople.ie Ph: 01 8870690
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
WRC Finds Dismissal Unfair When Employer Fails to Engage
By Tara Daly September 2, 2025
Every business needs solid HR support, that support doesn’t have to be an all-or-nothing affair, a flexible, scalable HR service can assist in your companies growth.
Three Tips to Improve Your Recruitment Process
By Tara Daly August 12, 2025
Lets explore how Irish employers can streamline hiring processes through technology, compliant CV screening, targeted advertising, and a strong employer brand.