The EU Commission Guidelines on Prohibited AI Practices

March 12, 2025

On February 4, 2025, the European Commission released draft guidelines clarifying prohibited AI practices under the EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act. These guidelines aim to ensure the consistent and effective application of the AI Act across the European Union. While non-binding, they offer valuable insights into the Commission's interpretation of prohibited practices.



Key Prohibited AI Practices and Employer Risks


The AI Act identifies certain AI practices as posing unacceptable risks to fundamental rights and European values. Notable prohibitions include:


1. Manipulative Techniques


Prohibition: AI systems that deploy subliminal or purposefully manipulative techniques, distorting an individual's behaviour without their awareness, leading to decisions they would not have otherwise made, and causing or likely causing significant harm.


Example:            Some AI-powered recruitment platforms claim to predict a candidate’s job suitability based on their facial expressions or voice tone during video interviews. If these systems use subliminal nudges to influence the recruiter’s perception or decision-making, they could fall foul of the AI Act.


2. Exploitation of Vulnerabilities


Prohibition: AI systems that exploit vulnerabilities of individuals or specific groups due to age, disability, or social or economic situations, materially distorting their behaviour in a manner that causes or is likely to cause significant harm.


Example:            An AI-driven job-matching tool that intentionally steers lower-income applicants towards low-paying roles, based on assumptions about their socioeconomic status, would be considered exploitative under the Act. Similarly, AI screening tools that disadvantage candidates with disabilities by misinterpreting speech patterns or movement in video interviews could violate the law.


3. Social Scoring


Prohibition: AI systems that evaluate or classify individuals based on their social behaviour or predicted personal characteristics, leading to detrimental or unfavourable treatment unrelated to the original context of data collection, or treatment that is unjustified or disproportionate.


Example:            If an employer uses an AI system to analyse employees’ social media activity and assigns them a risk score influencing promotions or disciplinary action, this would be a clear case of unlawful social scoring. Similarly, AI-powered tools that assess employee performance based on personal lifestyle choices, such as credit scores or location tracking outside work hours, could breach the AI Act.


4. Emotion Recognition in the Workplace


Prohibition: AI systems designed to infer emotions of individuals in workplace settings, except where intended for medical or safety purposes.


Example: Some companies deploy AI tools to monitor employees' facial expressions during meetings or track their tone of voice in customer service calls to assess engagement or stress levels. Such systems, if not strictly used for medical or safety reasons, would be prohibited under the AI Act.


Implications for Employers


Employers utilising AI systems must assess their practices to ensure compliance with the AI Act. Key considerations include:


  • Review AI Systems: Evaluate current AI tools, especially those used in recruitment, employee monitoring, and decision-making processes, to ensure they do not employ prohibited practices.
  • Policy Updates: Revise internal policies to reflect the prohibitions outlined in the AI Act, ensuring that AI deployments align with ethical standards and legal requirements.
  • Training and Awareness: Educate HR professionals and relevant staff about the AI Act's provisions, emphasising the importance of ethical AI use and the potential risks associated with non-compliance.
  • Vendor Management: Ensure that third-party AI service providers comply with the AI Act, incorporating compliance requirements into contracts and conducting regular audits.


Enforcement and Penalties


The AI Act establishes a comprehensive framework for AI governance. Non-compliance can result in significant penalties, including fines up to €35 million or 7% of annual global turnover for serious breaches.


Conclusion


The European Commission's guidelines on prohibited AI practices under the AI Act underscore the EU's commitment to ethical AI deployment. Employers must proactively assess and adjust their AI systems and policies to align with these guidelines, ensuring the protection of individual rights and maintaining public trust in AI technologies. By taking these steps now, businesses can avoid potential legal risks and foster a fair and compliant AI-driven workplace.

By David Casey June 12, 2026
One of the biggest mistakes we see employers make is starting recruitment before defining exactly what they need.  When a vacancy arises, there is often pressure to recruit quickly. However, taking time to plan before advertising a role can significantly improve recruitment outcomes and reduce costly hiring mistakes. Before starting the recruitment process, employers should ask themselves five fundamental questions. 1. Do We Actually Need to Hire This Person? Before recruiting, consider whether a new hire is genuinely required. Is the workload permanent? Could responsibilities be redistributed? Is there another solution available? Recruitment should address a business need, not simply fill a vacant seat. 2. What Exactly Do We Need From This Person? Many employers focus on job titles rather than outcomes. Consider: • What responsibilities will they own? • What skills are essential? • What results should they achieve? A clear understanding of the role makes it easier to identify the right candidate. 3. Will This Candidate Be the Right Cultural Fit? Technical skills are important, but so is cultural fit. A candidate may have the right experience on paper, but will they align with your company values, team dynamics, and ways of working? Long-term success often depends on both capability and compatibility. 4. Are Our Expectations Realistic and Sustainable? Unrealistic expectations can make recruitment unnecessarily difficult. Employers should assess whether the salary, responsibilities, and required experience are aligned with the realities of the market. The ideal candidate rarely ticks every box. 5. Do We Have the Infrastructure to Support and Retain Them? Hiring successfully requires a meaningful investment of time. Before proceeding, evaluate whether you have the necessary time, administrative resources, and budget to effectively interview, onboard, and train a new employee. Recruitment doesn't end when the offer is accepted. Supporting and retaining talent is equally important. Key Takeaway Recruitment done right is rewarding for both employers and employees, laying the foundation for a successful and productive working relationship. However, it requires careful planning, time, and investment to achieve the best outcomes. Taking the time to answer these five questions before recruiting can help streamline your hiring process, protect your budget, and ensure you're attracting the right person for your business. If you're planning a hire and would like support with your recruitment strategy, we're happy to help. info@mssthehrpeople.ie | 01 887 0690
WRC Upholds Constructive Dismissal and Protected Disclosure Complaints
By Amy Vickers June 4, 2026
Health and safety concerns, deteriorating workplace relationships and poor record keeping create significant exposure for employers
WRC Criticises Employer Conduct, Workplace Practices and AI Generated Submission
By Amy Vickers June 4, 2026
WRC decision highlights that seemingly casual comments, compliance failures, and the careless use of AI material can all contribute to legal liability
Is workplace conflict increasing, or are employees less tolerant?
By Amy Vickers June 4, 2026
Are workplaces actually becoming more difficult or are employees simply becoming far less willing to tolerate behaviour that previous generations may have ignored
How Long Is Too Long? The Cost of Delayed Recruitment Decisions
By Amy Vickers June 4, 2026
Many employers would be surprised to learn how often good candidates are lost because a recruitment process takes too long.
By Tara Daly May 19, 2026
Irish employers are increasingly turning to international hiring as a solution to ongoing skills shortages. This trend is particularly evident in sectors where local talent is limited and demand continues to grow. Why employers are looking overseas Common drivers include: • Difficulty filling specialist roles locally • Business expansion and growth • Increased competition for talent International hiring can provide access to a wider talent pool and support long-term workforce planning. The challenge While the opportunity is clear, the employment permit process can be complex. Employers often underestimate: • The level of detail required in applications • The importance of aligning with eligibility criteria • The potential for delays or refusals Where the process is not managed properly, the impact can be significant. Roles remain open for longer, business plans are affected, and onboarding timelines move further out than expected. Getting it right A structured and informed approach is essential. This includes: • Understanding the appropriate permit type • Ensuring the role meets eligibility requirements • Preparing a clear and robust application Where employers take the time to position the role properly and support the application with strong documentation, the process is far more likely to run smoothly. Key takeaway for employers International hiring can be a highly effective solution, but only where the permit process is managed correctly. Approached properly, it enables businesses to secure the talent they need to grow and succeed with greater certainty and less disruption. If you would like advice or support with the employment permit process, our team would be happy to assist. info@mssthehrpeople.ie | 01 887 0690
By Tara Daly May 13, 2026
A common approach we encounter is employers submitting an employment permit application and waiting to see what happens. While understandable, this approach carries significant risk. Why this approach falls short Employment permit applications are not a simple box-ticking exercise. Each application is assessed based on: • Eligibility • Justification • Alignment with current criteria If any of these elements are unclear or insufficient, the application may be delayed or refused. The impact of getting it wrong Where an application is unsuccessful: • Timelines are extended • Recruitment plans are disrupted • Candidates may withdraw In a competitive hiring market, these delays can have a real impact on the business. A role can remain unfilled for longer than expected, existing teams can come under pressure, and a strong candidate may choose another opportunity. A better approach Employers should approach permit applications as a structured process, focusing on: • Clear alignment with eligibility criteria • Strong and accurate role definition • Comprehensive supporting rationale It is far more effective to identify and address risk areas before submission than to deal with the consequences of delay or refusal later. Key takeaway for employers Submitting an application without fully assessing the risks can lead to avoidable delays. A well-prepared application significantly improves the likelihood of a successful outcome and gives the employer greater confidence throughout the process. If you’re planning an overseas hire or facing delays, we’re happy to talk it through. info@mssthehrpeople.ie | 01 887 0690
WRC awards €15,000 after employee kept on “specific purpose” contract for 10 years
By Amy Vickers May 7, 2026
A recent WRC decision is a very important reminder to employers that long running “specific purpose” and fixed term arrangements can create significant risk
Workplace Bullying, Harassment and Sexual Harassment Claims Are Rising
By Amy Vickers May 7, 2026
Increase in complaints relating to bullying, harassment, and sexual harassment and the complexity and escalation of these cases.
Supporting Employees Through Pregnancy Loss
By Amy Vickers May 7, 2026
Pregnancy loss is a deeply personal experience. For employers, these situations can be equally challenging because of the uncertainty around it.