Protection of Employees (Fixed Term Work) Act 2003

November 12, 2018

This legislation came into effect on 14th July 2003 and is intended to ensure that workers on fixed term contracts will not be treated less favourably than a comparable permanent worker.


Who is covered?


Any person on a fixed term contract (VETCH) but does not include an agency person working with a client, apprentices, trainee Guard or nursing or members of the Defense Forces.


What is a Fixed Term Contract Employee?


Any person under a contract to an employer where the end of the contract is determined by an objective condition - that is -


  • Expiry of a specified period between a specified date
  • Expiry of a specified purpose
  • The achievement of a specific event


To what does it Apply?


Contract employees are entitled to be treated no less favourably than a comparable permanent worker in relation to all terms and conditions of employment. Except, in the case of a contract worker working less than 20% of the time of a comparable permanent worker, in relation to pensions.


What is a comparable permanent Worker?


A permanent employee not on a fixed contract is a comparable worker if -


  • Employed by the same associated employer (subject to 1,2,3 below)
  • Is an employee specified in a collective agreement which applies to the contract employee
  • Employed in the same industry or sector (subject to 1,2,3 below)


In the case of a) and c) above one of the conditions must apply.


  • Both employees perform the same work under similar conditions or are interchangeable.
  • Work is of the same or similar nature with any differences being insignificant
  • Work is equal to or greater to a comparable permanent employee.


When can a Contract Employee be treated less favourably?


Employers may treat contract employees less favourably where they can prove objective grounds for such. An objective ground would be where the different treatment can be justified in that the difference in treatment does not relate to the status of the employee and is for the purpose of achieving a legitimate objective and is necessary to achieve that objective.


Pension - Please note as stated above where the contract employee worked 20% of the comparable employees time, this would be an objective reason for not applying pensions.


Entitlements based on hours worked


Where benefit is base don hours worked then a contract employee would be entitled to these benefits on a pro rata basis where they work lesser hours.


Can we renew Fixed Term Contracts?


Employers may renew fixed term contracts subject to below.

The employer must do so in writing no later than the date of renewal and must state the objective grounds for renewing the contract and the reason why no indefinite duration contract was offered.


FTC's commencing after 14th July 2003

Where a contract employee has been employed on two or more continuous fixed term contracts then the average duration may not exceed four years except where an objective ground is presented.


FTC's commencing before 14th July 2003

Where fixed term contract has been in existence for up to three years occurring before or after the date, the contract may be renewed for maximum of one year with the average duration not exceeding four years.


Employer Obligations


Employers must notify contract employees of permanent vacancies arising and also of training opportunities insofar as it is practical for contract employees to participate in them.


Employers should, insofar as is practicable, advise employee representatives as to fixed term contract workers in the undertaking.


Disputes


When an employee has a dispute with an employer regarding their entitlement on this legislation they may refer the matter to the Rights Commissioner. The Rights Commissioner may;


  • Declare the complaint was or was not well founded
  • Require the employer to comply with the act
  • Require the employer to reinstate or reengage the employee, (including on a contract of indefinite duration)
  • Order compensation not exceeding two years remuneration.
  • Appeals of a Rights Commissioner must be made within six weeks of communication to the Labour Court. Where the decision has not been implemented the employee may refer it to the Labour Court within six weeks of communication. In such cases the employer is precluded from attending the hearing or producing any new evidence to the Labour Court.


Appeals of the Labour Court are to the High Court whose decision shall be final and conclusive.

The 2026 Minimum Wage Increase — What It Means for Small Businesses and How to Get Ready
By Tara Daly October 22, 2025
The increase to €14.15 per hour will have a noticeable effect on small and medium sized businesses.
WRC Award €22k for Dismissal Regarding Sexually Explicit Texts
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
A recent Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruling has once again reinforced one of the most important principles in employment law.
Thousands of ChatGPT Conversations Available Online
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
With over 100,000 chats searchable online exposing private info, here's why employers need clear AI policies, training, and safeguards to protect sensitive data.
Budget 2026: What It Means for Employers and SMEs
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
While there are some positive measures many SMEs will feel extra pressure from wage and pension changes taking effect in 2026.
Auto-Enrolment Update: November 2025 Payroll Deadline
By Tara Daly October 1, 2025
Ireland’s new Auto-Enrolment pension scheme, My Future Fund, is edging closer and the timeline has just shifted again. Employers now need to act sooner than expected
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
What Employers Need to Know
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
In this blog, we explore a recent WRC ruling where a school was ordered to pay €85,000 in compensation after a teacher was discriminated against during an interview. The case highlights how even seemingly harmless remarks can have serious legal consequences for employers. What Actually Happened? Employee, Emily Williams, who had been working at the school under fixed-term contract and had two years’ experience there, was on maternity leave when a permanent teaching post arose. She was neither notified nor considered, even though she was eligible. Instead, the school awarded the role to a less-experienced colleague not on leave. During a subsequent interview for a fixed-term position, the principal congratulated Williams on the birth of her baby and added: “You really should enjoy every moment at home with the baby.” Williams felt the comment was unprofessional and likely influenced the outcome against her as she had learned she was unsuccessful the very next day. Why the WRC Ruled It Was Discrimination The WRC adjudicator found that: The principal’s comment, made before scoring was complete, was inappropriate and highlighted Williams’ family status. The school could not justify why a less-experienced teacher was chosen. Their claim that it was based on prior interview scores was unsupported, with no clear process to back it up. One interviewer even adjusted a score for Williams downward without explanation, further undermining the credibility of the decision. Given these failures, the WRC concluded that Williams had established a clear case of discrimination on grounds of family status. She was awarded €85,000 in compensation, with the adjudicator stressing the importance of deterrence in cases like this. Why This Ruling Matters for Employers This case underscores three vital lessons for HR and hiring managers. First, keep personal matters out of formal interviews. Even a well-meaning comment can suggest bias or influence the panel. The interview must remain strictly professional. Second, ensure documentation and process are watertight. Reliable scoring systems, consistent policies, and clear records are essential. Without them, hiring decisions become legally and reputationally vulnerable. Finally, fairness must be more than form, it must be function. Interviews should be blind to protected statuses such as family or maternity, and all decisions must be transparent and defensible. How MSS The HR People Can Help MSS is here to help Irish businesses avoid situations like this: Designing discrimination-safe interview processes, from structuring interview panels to defining scoring metrics Training hiring panels on unconscious bias and employment equality legislation Developing clear recruitment communication policies that avoid risks around maternity or other protected characteristics Providing support and representation if a dispute arises before the WRC  Let’s ensure recruitment is fair, transparent, and free of unintended prejudice. Reach out to MSS The HR People, and we’ll help you build safe, compliant hiring practices. MSS The HR People info@mssthehrpeople.ie Ph: 01 8870690
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
WRC Finds Dismissal Unfair When Employer Fails to Engage
By Tara Daly September 2, 2025
Every business needs solid HR support, that support doesn’t have to be an all-or-nothing affair, a flexible, scalable HR service can assist in your companies growth.
Three Tips to Improve Your Recruitment Process
By Tara Daly August 12, 2025
Lets explore how Irish employers can streamline hiring processes through technology, compliant CV screening, targeted advertising, and a strong employer brand.