New Code of Practice on Workplace Bullying

February 3, 2021

NEW CODE OF PRACTICE ON WORKPLACE BULLYING 


A new Code of Practice was developed and published on the 5th January 2021 (Industrial Relations Act 1990 (Code of Practice for Employers and Employees on the Prevention and Resolution of Bullying at Work) Order 2020) which replaces the Codes of Practice published by The Health and Safety Authority (HSA) and Labour Relations Commission (now Workplace Relations Commission - WRC).


THE NEW CODE OF PRACTICE

This Code of Practice provides practical guidance for employers on identifying and preventing bullying at work arising from their Duty of Care under the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005. Under the Act, employers are expected to manage and conduct work activities in such a way as to prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable, any improper conduct or behaviour likely to put the safety, health and welfare at work of his or her employees at risk.


Employees also have similar responsibilities under the Act to not engage in improper conduct or behaviour that is likely to endanger their own safety, health and welfare at work or that of any other person.


This Code applies to all employments in Ireland irrespective of whether employees work at a fixed location, at home or are mobile.


DEFINITION OF BULLYING

Bullying is defined as:

Repeated inappropriate behaviour, direct or indirect, whether verbal, physical or otherwise, conducted by one or more persons against another or others, at the place of work and/or in the course of employment, which could be reasonably regarded as undermining the individual's right to dignity at work. An isolated incident of the behaviour described in this definition may be an affront to dignity at work, but, as a once off incident, is not considered to be bullying.

While there were no changes made to the definition of Bullying, in comparison with the previous Codes of Practice, the new Code states bullying could include the use of cyber or digital means.


It further outlines a non-exhaustive list of behaviours that can be considered bullying, such as blaming a person for things beyond their control, repeatedly manipulating a person's job content and targets or excessive monitoring of work.


WHAT IS NOT CONSIDERED BULLYING

The new Code of Practice also helpfully describes situations which should not be regarded as workplace bullying and these include:

• Expressing differences of opinion strongly
• Offering constructive feedback, guidance, or advice about work-related behaviour which is not of itself welcome
• Ordinary performance management
• Reasonable corrective action taken by an employer or supervisor relating to the management and direction of employees (for example managing a worker's performance, taking reasonable disciplinary actions, or assigning work)
• Workplace conflict where people disagree or disregard the others’ point of view
(This list is not exhaustive).


Additionally, as set out in the definition above, a once-off incident of bullying behaviour may be an affront to dignity at work and may be unsettling, but does not of itself make for an adequate level of distress as to fall within the definition of bullying and other remedies should be sought for these scenarios. As a once-off, such behaviours cannot be presumed to be done in a targeted, purposeful and unremitting way.


SECONDARY INFORMAL PROCESS

The Code recognises that informal solutions are to be encouraged where possible. An informal approach may effectively address the unwanted behaviour without recourse to any other action. Sometimes the person who is alleged to be engaging in the behaviour is genuinely unaware that the behaviour being complained of is disrespectful or unwelcome or undermining and/or causing distress. Therefore, it is always recommended, to encourage employees to try and resolve issues that arise informally in the first instance, subject to the agreement of the parties involved.

Whils

t informal resolution was always included in the Codes of Practice on Bullying, the New Code of Practice provides an additional option of a Secondary Informal Process.


If the first stage was unsuccessful or, if the complainant or the employer deems it inappropriate due to the seriousness of the issues, this more protracted yet still informal system can be put in place.


In this process, the employer may nominate a separate person who has had appropriate training and experience and who is familiar with the procedures involved to deal with the complaint. For each complaint that arises, such a person should be assigned to deal with that particular case. Effective guidance and training should be in place for those who are engaged at this level with the process.


The appointed person would meet with the complainant and the person complained against and establish their responses to the situation. Following this, a method should be agreed to progress the issue to resolution to assist both parties to return to a harmonious working environment without bullying being a factor.


The nominated person who was responsible for managing the complaint should keep a nominal record of all stages, including the complaint, the first meeting, action agreed and signed records of the final meeting. The purpose of the records, which do not include detail of discussions, is to provide evidence of the complaint having been met with an organisational response and attempt at resolution.


Following the resolution of the issue, both parties should be given support or periodical reviews, insofar as is reasonable, which, if necessary, could include counselling or other appropriate interventions or support services.


The new Code of Practice outlines also the formal procedure, as previous Codes did, however, recommends that all informal resolution avenues - as set out above - should be contemplated and where appropriate, exhausted before a formal process is invoked.


ANTI-BULLYING POLICY

In light of this new Code of Practice, we recommend all employers revise their Anti-bullying/dignity at work policies to make sure their policies are up to date.


While this Code refers to workplace bullying only and doesn’t include harassment cases, this does not prevent employers from having one policy/document encompassing procedures for processing both bullying and harassment cases.


Failure to follow the new Code of Practice is not an offence in itself. However, in any proceedings before a Court, the Labour Court or the Workplace Relations Commission, the code of practice shall be admissible as evidence and where the Code appears to the body concerned to be relevant to any question arising in the proceedings it shall be taken into account in determining that question.


Additionally, it is not enough to just have the policy in place.


New employees, at all levels, should be made aware of the policy as part of any formal induction process. Where a staff handbook is distributed to employees as part of the induction process, the Anti-Bullying Policy should be included.


Moreover, existing employees should receive updated and regular communication on the policy.


As outlined in the Code of Practice, bullying at work may arise, not only from work colleagues but also by non-employees, such as clients, customers, sub-contractors and business contacts. In line with that, a summary of the Anti-Bullying Policy should be prominently displayed at places where members of the public, clients, and customers attend.


See our Dignity At Work - Bullying in The Workplace Course Here



FURTHER DETAILS ON THE UPDATE OR ABOUT OUR SERVICES MAY BE OBTAINED

FROM: JOHN BARRY/TARA DALY/ HUGH HEGARTY AT TEL: 01 8870690


Contact Us
The 2026 Minimum Wage Increase — What It Means for Small Businesses and How to Get Ready
By Tara Daly October 22, 2025
The increase to €14.15 per hour will have a noticeable effect on small and medium sized businesses.
WRC Award €22k for Dismissal Regarding Sexually Explicit Texts
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
A recent Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruling has once again reinforced one of the most important principles in employment law.
Thousands of ChatGPT Conversations Available Online
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
With over 100,000 chats searchable online exposing private info, here's why employers need clear AI policies, training, and safeguards to protect sensitive data.
Budget 2026: What It Means for Employers and SMEs
By Tara Daly October 14, 2025
While there are some positive measures many SMEs will feel extra pressure from wage and pension changes taking effect in 2026.
Auto-Enrolment Update: November 2025 Payroll Deadline
By Tara Daly October 1, 2025
Ireland’s new Auto-Enrolment pension scheme, My Future Fund, is edging closer and the timeline has just shifted again. Employers now need to act sooner than expected
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
What Employers Need to Know
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
In this blog, we explore a recent WRC ruling where a school was ordered to pay €85,000 in compensation after a teacher was discriminated against during an interview. The case highlights how even seemingly harmless remarks can have serious legal consequences for employers. What Actually Happened? Employee, Emily Williams, who had been working at the school under fixed-term contract and had two years’ experience there, was on maternity leave when a permanent teaching post arose. She was neither notified nor considered, even though she was eligible. Instead, the school awarded the role to a less-experienced colleague not on leave. During a subsequent interview for a fixed-term position, the principal congratulated Williams on the birth of her baby and added: “You really should enjoy every moment at home with the baby.” Williams felt the comment was unprofessional and likely influenced the outcome against her as she had learned she was unsuccessful the very next day. Why the WRC Ruled It Was Discrimination The WRC adjudicator found that: The principal’s comment, made before scoring was complete, was inappropriate and highlighted Williams’ family status. The school could not justify why a less-experienced teacher was chosen. Their claim that it was based on prior interview scores was unsupported, with no clear process to back it up. One interviewer even adjusted a score for Williams downward without explanation, further undermining the credibility of the decision. Given these failures, the WRC concluded that Williams had established a clear case of discrimination on grounds of family status. She was awarded €85,000 in compensation, with the adjudicator stressing the importance of deterrence in cases like this. Why This Ruling Matters for Employers This case underscores three vital lessons for HR and hiring managers. First, keep personal matters out of formal interviews. Even a well-meaning comment can suggest bias or influence the panel. The interview must remain strictly professional. Second, ensure documentation and process are watertight. Reliable scoring systems, consistent policies, and clear records are essential. Without them, hiring decisions become legally and reputationally vulnerable. Finally, fairness must be more than form, it must be function. Interviews should be blind to protected statuses such as family or maternity, and all decisions must be transparent and defensible. How MSS The HR People Can Help MSS is here to help Irish businesses avoid situations like this: Designing discrimination-safe interview processes, from structuring interview panels to defining scoring metrics Training hiring panels on unconscious bias and employment equality legislation Developing clear recruitment communication policies that avoid risks around maternity or other protected characteristics Providing support and representation if a dispute arises before the WRC  Let’s ensure recruitment is fair, transparent, and free of unintended prejudice. Reach out to MSS The HR People, and we’ll help you build safe, compliant hiring practices. MSS The HR People info@mssthehrpeople.ie Ph: 01 8870690
By Tara Daly September 3, 2025
WRC Finds Dismissal Unfair When Employer Fails to Engage
By Tara Daly September 2, 2025
Every business needs solid HR support, that support doesn’t have to be an all-or-nothing affair, a flexible, scalable HR service can assist in your companies growth.
Three Tips to Improve Your Recruitment Process
By Tara Daly August 12, 2025
Lets explore how Irish employers can streamline hiring processes through technology, compliant CV screening, targeted advertising, and a strong employer brand.