New Code of Practice on Workplace Bullying

February 3, 2021

NEW CODE OF PRACTICE ON WORKPLACE BULLYING 


A new Code of Practice was developed and published on the 5th January 2021 (Industrial Relations Act 1990 (Code of Practice for Employers and Employees on the Prevention and Resolution of Bullying at Work) Order 2020) which replaces the Codes of Practice published by The Health and Safety Authority (HSA) and Labour Relations Commission (now Workplace Relations Commission - WRC).


THE NEW CODE OF PRACTICE

This Code of Practice provides practical guidance for employers on identifying and preventing bullying at work arising from their Duty of Care under the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005. Under the Act, employers are expected to manage and conduct work activities in such a way as to prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable, any improper conduct or behaviour likely to put the safety, health and welfare at work of his or her employees at risk.


Employees also have similar responsibilities under the Act to not engage in improper conduct or behaviour that is likely to endanger their own safety, health and welfare at work or that of any other person.


This Code applies to all employments in Ireland irrespective of whether employees work at a fixed location, at home or are mobile.


DEFINITION OF BULLYING

Bullying is defined as:

Repeated inappropriate behaviour, direct or indirect, whether verbal, physical or otherwise, conducted by one or more persons against another or others, at the place of work and/or in the course of employment, which could be reasonably regarded as undermining the individual's right to dignity at work. An isolated incident of the behaviour described in this definition may be an affront to dignity at work, but, as a once off incident, is not considered to be bullying.

While there were no changes made to the definition of Bullying, in comparison with the previous Codes of Practice, the new Code states bullying could include the use of cyber or digital means.


It further outlines a non-exhaustive list of behaviours that can be considered bullying, such as blaming a person for things beyond their control, repeatedly manipulating a person's job content and targets or excessive monitoring of work.


WHAT IS NOT CONSIDERED BULLYING

The new Code of Practice also helpfully describes situations which should not be regarded as workplace bullying and these include:

• Expressing differences of opinion strongly
• Offering constructive feedback, guidance, or advice about work-related behaviour which is not of itself welcome
• Ordinary performance management
• Reasonable corrective action taken by an employer or supervisor relating to the management and direction of employees (for example managing a worker's performance, taking reasonable disciplinary actions, or assigning work)
• Workplace conflict where people disagree or disregard the others’ point of view
(This list is not exhaustive).


Additionally, as set out in the definition above, a once-off incident of bullying behaviour may be an affront to dignity at work and may be unsettling, but does not of itself make for an adequate level of distress as to fall within the definition of bullying and other remedies should be sought for these scenarios. As a once-off, such behaviours cannot be presumed to be done in a targeted, purposeful and unremitting way.


SECONDARY INFORMAL PROCESS

The Code recognises that informal solutions are to be encouraged where possible. An informal approach may effectively address the unwanted behaviour without recourse to any other action. Sometimes the person who is alleged to be engaging in the behaviour is genuinely unaware that the behaviour being complained of is disrespectful or unwelcome or undermining and/or causing distress. Therefore, it is always recommended, to encourage employees to try and resolve issues that arise informally in the first instance, subject to the agreement of the parties involved.

Whils

t informal resolution was always included in the Codes of Practice on Bullying, the New Code of Practice provides an additional option of a Secondary Informal Process.


If the first stage was unsuccessful or, if the complainant or the employer deems it inappropriate due to the seriousness of the issues, this more protracted yet still informal system can be put in place.


In this process, the employer may nominate a separate person who has had appropriate training and experience and who is familiar with the procedures involved to deal with the complaint. For each complaint that arises, such a person should be assigned to deal with that particular case. Effective guidance and training should be in place for those who are engaged at this level with the process.


The appointed person would meet with the complainant and the person complained against and establish their responses to the situation. Following this, a method should be agreed to progress the issue to resolution to assist both parties to return to a harmonious working environment without bullying being a factor.


The nominated person who was responsible for managing the complaint should keep a nominal record of all stages, including the complaint, the first meeting, action agreed and signed records of the final meeting. The purpose of the records, which do not include detail of discussions, is to provide evidence of the complaint having been met with an organisational response and attempt at resolution.


Following the resolution of the issue, both parties should be given support or periodical reviews, insofar as is reasonable, which, if necessary, could include counselling or other appropriate interventions or support services.


The new Code of Practice outlines also the formal procedure, as previous Codes did, however, recommends that all informal resolution avenues - as set out above - should be contemplated and where appropriate, exhausted before a formal process is invoked.


ANTI-BULLYING POLICY

In light of this new Code of Practice, we recommend all employers revise their Anti-bullying/dignity at work policies to make sure their policies are up to date.


While this Code refers to workplace bullying only and doesn’t include harassment cases, this does not prevent employers from having one policy/document encompassing procedures for processing both bullying and harassment cases.


Failure to follow the new Code of Practice is not an offence in itself. However, in any proceedings before a Court, the Labour Court or the Workplace Relations Commission, the code of practice shall be admissible as evidence and where the Code appears to the body concerned to be relevant to any question arising in the proceedings it shall be taken into account in determining that question.


Additionally, it is not enough to just have the policy in place.


New employees, at all levels, should be made aware of the policy as part of any formal induction process. Where a staff handbook is distributed to employees as part of the induction process, the Anti-Bullying Policy should be included.


Moreover, existing employees should receive updated and regular communication on the policy.


As outlined in the Code of Practice, bullying at work may arise, not only from work colleagues but also by non-employees, such as clients, customers, sub-contractors and business contacts. In line with that, a summary of the Anti-Bullying Policy should be prominently displayed at places where members of the public, clients, and customers attend.


See our Dignity At Work - Bullying in The Workplace Course Here



FURTHER DETAILS ON THE UPDATE OR ABOUT OUR SERVICES MAY BE OBTAINED

FROM: JOHN BARRY/TARA DALY/ HUGH HEGARTY AT TEL: 01 8870690


Contact Us
New Retirement Age Legislation Takes Effect on 29 June 2026
By Amy Vickers July 1, 2026
The Employment (Contractual Retirement Ages) Act 2025 introduces new obligations for employers who operate a contractual retirement age below State Pension Age .
Labour Court Issues First Decision on Right to Request Remote Working
By Amanda Scully June 30, 2026
A landmark Labour Court decision reinforces that the right to request remote working, highlighting the importance of employers following the correct process.
How SMEs Can Attract Great Candidates Without Big Salaries
By Amy Vickers June 30, 2026
Recruitment is about more than pay, and SMEs can gain a competitive edge by promoting the unique benefits of working in a smaller organisation.
Hot Weather in the Workplace: Employer's Responsibilities?
June 30, 2026
As Ireland experiences warmer weather, we examine employers' responsibilities and share practical tips for creating a safe and comfortable working environment.
By David Casey June 12, 2026
One of the biggest mistakes we see employers make is starting recruitment before defining exactly what they need.  When a vacancy arises, there is often pressure to recruit quickly. However, taking time to plan before advertising a role can significantly improve recruitment outcomes and reduce costly hiring mistakes. Before starting the recruitment process, employers should ask themselves five fundamental questions. 1. Do We Actually Need to Hire This Person? Before recruiting, consider whether a new hire is genuinely required. Is the workload permanent? Could responsibilities be redistributed? Is there another solution available? Recruitment should address a business need, not simply fill a vacant seat. 2. What Exactly Do We Need From This Person? Many employers focus on job titles rather than outcomes. Consider: • What responsibilities will they own? • What skills are essential? • What results should they achieve? A clear understanding of the role makes it easier to identify the right candidate. 3. Will This Candidate Be the Right Cultural Fit? Technical skills are important, but so is cultural fit. A candidate may have the right experience on paper, but will they align with your company values, team dynamics, and ways of working? Long-term success often depends on both capability and compatibility. 4. Are Our Expectations Realistic and Sustainable? Unrealistic expectations can make recruitment unnecessarily difficult. Employers should assess whether the salary, responsibilities, and required experience are aligned with the realities of the market. The ideal candidate rarely ticks every box. 5. Do We Have the Infrastructure to Support and Retain Them? Hiring successfully requires a meaningful investment of time. Before proceeding, evaluate whether you have the necessary time, administrative resources, and budget to effectively interview, onboard, and train a new employee. Recruitment doesn't end when the offer is accepted. Supporting and retaining talent is equally important. Key Takeaway Recruitment done right is rewarding for both employers and employees, laying the foundation for a successful and productive working relationship. However, it requires careful planning, time, and investment to achieve the best outcomes. Taking the time to answer these five questions before recruiting can help streamline your hiring process, protect your budget, and ensure you're attracting the right person for your business. If you're planning a hire and would like support with your recruitment strategy, we're happy to help. info@mssthehrpeople.ie | 01 887 0690
WRC Upholds Constructive Dismissal and Protected Disclosure Complaints
By Amy Vickers June 4, 2026
Health and safety concerns, deteriorating workplace relationships and poor record keeping create significant exposure for employers
WRC Criticises Employer Conduct, Workplace Practices and AI Generated Submission
By Amy Vickers June 4, 2026
WRC decision highlights that seemingly casual comments, compliance failures, and the careless use of AI material can all contribute to legal liability
Is workplace conflict increasing, or are employees less tolerant?
By Amy Vickers June 4, 2026
Are workplaces actually becoming more difficult or are employees simply becoming far less willing to tolerate behaviour that previous generations may have ignored
How Long Is Too Long? The Cost of Delayed Recruitment Decisions
By Amy Vickers June 4, 2026
Many employers would be surprised to learn how often good candidates are lost because a recruitment process takes too long.
By Tara Daly May 19, 2026
Irish employers are increasingly turning to international hiring as a solution to ongoing skills shortages. This trend is particularly evident in sectors where local talent is limited and demand continues to grow. Why employers are looking overseas Common drivers include: • Difficulty filling specialist roles locally • Business expansion and growth • Increased competition for talent International hiring can provide access to a wider talent pool and support long-term workforce planning. The challenge While the opportunity is clear, the employment permit process can be complex. Employers often underestimate: • The level of detail required in applications • The importance of aligning with eligibility criteria • The potential for delays or refusals Where the process is not managed properly, the impact can be significant. Roles remain open for longer, business plans are affected, and onboarding timelines move further out than expected. Getting it right A structured and informed approach is essential. This includes: • Understanding the appropriate permit type • Ensuring the role meets eligibility requirements • Preparing a clear and robust application Where employers take the time to position the role properly and support the application with strong documentation, the process is far more likely to run smoothly. Key takeaway for employers International hiring can be a highly effective solution, but only where the permit process is managed correctly. Approached properly, it enables businesses to secure the talent they need to grow and succeed with greater certainty and less disruption. If you would like advice or support with the employment permit process, our team would be happy to assist. info@mssthehrpeople.ie | 01 887 0690